A religion-labor
coalition appeared during the first decade of the 20th century,
reversing the prior hostile suspicion that many Church leaders (upper case C) had toward unions. The change was led
by the laity, not primarily by theologians, bishops and other pastors. Heath
Carter, using Chicago as his case study, exhaustively combs old newspapers,
letters, organizational statements and more to prove this thesis. The result is
Union Made: Working People and the Rise
of Social Christianity (Oxford University Press, 2015).
Workers,
it turns out, are the church (lower case c)
just as much as Church employees. Working people are “not systematic
theologians,” writes Carter. But Carter uncovers evidence that many took their
faith seriously, talked about it, and attempted to influence the Churchy types.
Evangelization, he shows, goes in the opposite direction of the usual
presumption. Workaday Christians actually evangelize the Church.
Protestant
ministers, dependent on the collection basket and other private donations, had
“long-standing ties [to] industrial elites,” Carter explains. Consequently, late
19th century working families criticized the clergy for their
lifestyle and for the ornate furnishings in many churches. Catholic clergy,
though less connected to the wealthy, sometimes adopted the same posture. Chicago
Catholic Bishop Anthony O’Regan (1809-1866), for example, was taken to task
over his “palatial estate.”
Protestant
theology developed a social analysis that can still be found in public policy
debates and in street corner conversations. “Poverty sprang from individual—not
systematic—defects,” common Protestant opinion said. Jesus’ saving grace was
for sinful individuals, not for an unjust society. The corollary said that
“prosperity was available to anyone willing to work for it.”
Though
Carter does not dwell on the point, this individualistic theology was (and is)
a companion to anti-Catholicism. Its signature campaign in days gone by was
anti-drinking; today it is probably anti-immigration.
Protestant
pastors scolded the laity for their interest in labor movements. Such
involvement was divisive, a distraction from individual salvation and a
violation of a contract, albeit a verbal one between and individual employer
and individual employee. Catholic clergy tended to emphasize another supposed
evil. The labor movements were susceptible to godless socialism.
There
were exceptions among the clergy. But in Carter’s case study many clergy said no to labor campaigns, including the
eight-hour day, wage increase for women, and racial justice in the workplace.
In general the no was louder when a
strike or boycott was involved.
The persistent effort of lay leaders paid
off. Through letters to the editor, presentations inside some churches,
speeches at rallies, and more ordinary workers gradually influenced Church
employees to reconsider the cause of labor. Also, as Carter details, working
families (more among Protestants than Catholics) began to stay home on Sunday
mornings. This became a wake-up call for Church leaders.
The New World is our Chicago Catholic newspaper.
Carter makes extensive use of its archive. Until the mid-1890s the newspaper
was cautiously reserved regarding labor movements. In 1891 Pope Leo XIII
(1810-1903) promulgated a great encyclical, On
the Condition of Labor. Though not in direct cause and effect, “a decisive
shift” occurred shortly thereafter in New
World reporting and editorials.
The
mutually beneficial relationship between Church leaders and labor movements was
part of the New Deal era and the civil rights era, Carter concludes. While each
party to the relationship must maintain its distinctive identity, cooperation
could benefit both today. The Church needs a point of contact with young
workers because they do not worship regularly. Unions and other labor
organizations need allies in a culture dominated by individual meritocracy.
There
are two ecumenical groups in Chicago dedicated to a religion-labor dialogue:
Arise (www.arisechicago.org) and Interfaith Worker Justice (www.iwj.org).
In addition and in keeping with Carter’s case study’s city, there are
two or three other organizations here that have the dialogue on their agenda,
including National Center for the Laity (www.catholiclabor.org/NCL.htm).
Droel
edits a free print newsletter about faith and work; INITIATIVES (PO Box 291102,
Chicago, IL 60629)
No comments:
Post a Comment