Monday, February 20, 2023

Bronzeville, a Colony in Milwaukee


“Then will gifts be brought to the Lord of Hosts from a people tall and bronzed...”                       Isaiah:18-Ethiopia

Bronzeville, Milwaukee, is located in the central city.  It was an African American neighborhood, a community with famous jazz clubs, bars, stores, barber shops, and churches.  African Americans were segregated living in Bronzeville and were not allowed to live in white neighborhoods.  Famous Black entertainers were not admitted to white hotels.  The Boston Braves, when they moved to Milwaukee, purchased a house in Bronzeville for their Black ball players.  Probably Paul Robeson lived in Bronzeville when he played pro football for the Milwaukee Badgers football team.

Lincoln Charles Valles came to Milwaukee from Chicago in 1908 for the purpose of establishing a Black Catholic community.  Mr. Valle, with the approval and help of Archbishop Sebastian Messmer and the follow-up assistance of Jesuit and Capuchin friars, founded Saint Benedict the Moor Mission, the forerunner of Saint Benedict the Moor Day and Boarding School.

Among the churches in Bronzeville was Saint Benedict the Moor, sponsored by the Capuchin Fathers.  The church complex included a boarding school and a hospital.  Henry Aaron’s oldest children were born at the hospital, Saint Anthony’s. 

Artist Unknown


Parishioners, Bonny and Pedro Cardona, owned a jazz night club in Bronzeville.  Their great granddaughter, Alisha Brockton, was a leading scorer on Marquette’s women’s basketball team.  Parishioner, Wesley Graham, remembered seeing Olympic champion, Ralph Metcalf, jogging from Bronzeville to the Marquette campus. 

Among the historic treasures at the church of Saint Benedict the Moor is a mural behind the altar depicting a 'black on black' massacre in Uganda in a battle over colonization.  The black martyrs look up to a Madonna. 



Pastor John Celichowski suggested to the artist restoring the mural to make the Madonna’s face darker and he did so. The church has carved friezes depicting black people. One frieze shows Saint Peter Claver ministering to black slaves recently arrived from Africa. 



Is there hope?  Can colonization move on from here?  Let us remember Martin Luther King, Jr. had a dream and Isaiah reminded us of Emanuel, that God is with us. 


Wednesday, February 15, 2023

Erasmus and Luther: Forces of Reform

 

 

An analysis by Janis Kuenning


   Somewhere between 1517 and 1521 Luther’s resolve became more clarified and strengthened. Though he had no initial intention of breaking with Rome, his internal struggle with what seemed to him the impossibility of salvation as presented by the church broke into an adamant belief in the Pauline teaching that “Man is justified by faith apart from the working of the Law!” (Romans 3:28) This belief seemed to free Luther from the pressures of his times that encouraged self-hatred and a blind obedience to authority. His statements about the Roman Catholic Church reflected this strong awakening in him to the point where he challenged the Pope’s absolute authority. He was excommunicated and called to defend his teachings at Worms before all the Christian rulers of his day. Here again he formulated his new sense of freedom in the terms of the supremacy of conscience, his own being “Captive to the Word of God.” This defense seems similar to scriptural prophets of old.
   After this hearing, Luther went into hiding. He had now broken with any support from Rome and from sympathizers like Erasmus who were against schism. Later Luther debated Erasmus over the concept of ‘Free Will’ and it was here that a very complete separation occurred. Luther simply did not accept the humanistic outlook of the world. “Far be it for Christians to be skeptics and academics.” Luther’s vision was more grounded in scripture and social events that transformed him personally rather than any scholarly pursuits.
   Luther’s challenge to the religious authorities was upheld and protected by the German princes, who were, for different reasons, in tension with Rome over its workings in competition with the nation-states. Unlike Erasmus, Luther actually seemed to have no optimism for the Kingdoms of this world. Despite their protection of him, Luther expressed in his ‘two Kingdoms’ theory writing that peace would not come through princes and rarely ever would rise a truly Christian prince: “The just shall live by faith.” (Romans 1:17) Luther had confidence in the Kingdom of God but very little confident in the Kingdoms of this world. He did not foresee, as Erasmus did, Christian princes ruling a peaceable kingdom.
   Erasmus’s adamant stand on war, provoked especially by popes such as Leo III, seemed in contrast to Luther’s stand on the gruesome Peasant War (1524-1525) that was a result of the influence of the Reformation. I think it is comparable to the doubt and fear raised over Liberation theology in recent decades and teaches us an unfortunate lesson in history.
   Unlike Erasmus, Luther did not appeal to, nor remain in the Catholic Church and gradually formed a new church in which he supported the universal priesthood of the faithful and rejected the ‘human thought’ that one could earn or deserve salvation. In other words, I think he brought the church hierarchy, based on the Roman model, down to ground level.
   While Erasmus leaned toward acceptance of the ancient wisdom of Roman rule overall, Luther saw it as a direct contrast to Christian teaching found in scripture. Relying on scripture and the words of Christ alone, Luther saw the hierarchy and its resulting behavior as a worldly practice rather than a religious one. Luther saw the structure as promulgating more of a nation-state than a Christianity community. Freed from the guilt and shame many felt at the time, (exemplified in the payment of indulgences), Luther in the end was free not only of that guilt and shame so epic in his times, but free to challenge the leaders of the church itself on the basis of his own God given conscience.
   Erasmus and Luther rode on tides of a tumultuous age of upheaval and change. One might be seen more as a ‘thinker,’ the other a ‘doer.’ One stood for gradual reform, the other for immediate change. One helped guide the tide of necessary reform within the Catholic Church. The other took the stand that even the Church, and certainly it follows, that secular authorities can be challenged, made up as they are of human beings. From Erasmus in this sense, I learned of the value of objectivity and tolerance and cool headedness in educating and guiding fellow men and women through times of crisis. From Luther I learned that the primacy of conscience is a fundamental principle that can stem the tides of crisis by means of taking a firm and committed stand. Both lessons of this historical period in Church history can and will, I am sure, continue to guide great leaders and individuals in our present culture.
 

 

 

 

Tuesday, February 7, 2023

Words from Sister Dorothy and Those Who Knew Her by Rev. Dr. Matthew Fox

 02/04/2023


 


Wednesday, February 1, 2023

The Working Catholic: Flee the World? by Bill Droel

 

           The monastic idea is to devote one’s entire attention to God. Doing so during the Middle Ages meant turning against the frivolous distractions of the world and concentrating fully on God, writes Jamie Kreiner in The Wandering Mind: What Medieval Monks Tell Us About Distraction (Liveright, 2023).

Various monasteries and individual monks (women and men) used multiple techniques for achieving singular attention. Some practices were extreme. Plenty of monastic types, like most of us, had some amount of attention disorder. The common monastic practice of a daily regimen of prayer, chores and sleep could be helpful. It was often adopted, with modification, among lay people within and around the monastery. In fact, the monastic model of spirituality in part guides many Christians to this day.

The premise of other-worldly monasticism, however, needs to be challenged. (Contemporary monks have, by the way, long recognized the need to adapt.)

Is God really found away from the hustle-and bustle? Scripture does not depict a remote God. Think about it. The entire saga of salvation history could have ended when Eve and Adam took their easterly walk away from the garden. Had God not followed them into the imperfect world, the story would have been quite brief. Soon enough though, God was involved in family discord, matchmaking, territory decisions, military strategy, animal husbandry and lots more.

The entire Incarnation, to read what Christians call the New Testament, is the story of God within our broken world. Scripture tells us about Joseph neglecting motel reservations in Bethlehem on a holiday weekend, about newlywed friends of the Holy Couple miscalculating their wine order, about fishing expeditions, about struggles with chronic illness, about political oppression and many other elements common to daily life.

Yes, sometimes Scripture reveals God breaking through normal routines and expectations. God is miraculous. Yes, Scripture often suggests a short retreat from the world—often to a mountain. But God is here, right now, Tuesday afternoon, lurking within the mundane emails, the crabby co-workers, the wonder of a child, the poor near the train station, the hectic pace in the hospital and the neighborly encounter.

But how? Tasks must be completed, dinner prepared, children picked up, bus to catch, call to make, note to type. The word spirituality can be rendered discipline. Anything done regularly that puts one in contact with the transcendent is spirituality. Just as in the Middle Ages, attuning to God requires practice. In our day and age, as St. John Paul II (1920-2005) recommends, a “Christian spirituality of work should be a heritage shared by all.” A contemporary spirituality means alertness to the extraordinary amid the ordinary. It means to sharpen one’s analogical or sacramental imagination.

Keep in mind that a spirituality of work does not mean that people are consciously aware of God at every single minute. A busy person correctly makes God one’s intention in the morning and then spends some moments late in the day recalling when and how God was on the scene unawares.

 Keep in mind too that confident holiness is not needed before one starts the day or the month. As the monasteries understood, holiness is a by-product of action. Simply be alert during one’s commute, stay tuned-in during class, double-check the email before hitting send, and apologize to the co-worker with whom you have been brusque. If you are on a picket line, keep walking. You might become holy. If your presentation is weak, keep researching. You might become holy. If your office is dysfunctional, stop the gossip and gather others for reform. You might become holy.

Are there specific elements to a spirituality of work? To be continued…

Droel edits a printed newsletter on faith and work, INITIATIVES (PO Box 291102, Chicago, IL 60629)