Bill Droel is editor of INITIATIVES, a newsletter about faith and work.
Misguided Voters’ Guide
Our U.S. Catholic bishops periodically
issue a voters’ guide; most recently in the form of a 36-page booklet, “Forming
Consciences for Faithful Citizenship.” Its next edition is scheduled for Fall
2015—in time for the presidential campaign. In light of themes stressed by Pope
Francis the U.S. bishops will edit the guide to give more prominence to the
“option for the poor and vulnerable.”
As long as editing is in process, I make
this suggestion: Drop the project. No one is waiting to read what bishops think
about politics. Citizens who carry their Catholicism into the voting booth
already know how they determine their candidates. Further, bishops’ credibility
is unfortunately so low these days that their effective witness can only be
humble service, not public statements.
There is also some evidence that young
adults become further disaffected from the church when bishops and clergy wade
into politics. One’s general ideology or politics (liberal or conservative)
seems to drive one’s attraction to or neglect of regular worship, write
sociologists Robert Putnam and David Campbell in American Grace (Simon & Schuster, 2010). The evidence, at least
tentatively, says religious formation does not per se determine political temperament. It is the other way around.
Conservatives worship at a higher rate than liberals.
Now for step two in Putnam and
Campbell’s argument. Young adults perceive religious leaders who assert
themselves in public as conservative—even though Catholic bishops sometimes
advocate for liberal policies like immigration reform. Young adults are not in
the main conservative, which to them also means intolerant. Thus, they are
turned off by religious leaders who get political. “Mixing God and Caesar is
bad for both” religion and politics, Putnam and Campbell conclude.
The bishops, of course, will ignore my
suggestion. Their guidance to voters, as “Forming Consciences” says, is not
just another opinion. As “the Church’s teachers,” the bishops feel obliged to
speak regardless of the reception. Besides, the bureaucratic wheel is in motion
and a revised voters’ guide must appear.
OK, here’s another suggestion: Quit
telling Catholics to vote for individual candidates based on their
positions as they affect “human life and dignity as well as issues of justice
and peace.” The bishops want voters “to see beyond party politics…and to choose
their political leaders according to principle, not party affiliation.”
We have an adage in my Chicago
neighborhood: “Punch the ticket.” It means, vote the party’s slate of
candidates. In Catholicism this is called the
principle of subsidiarity. The idea is that a middle-range of smaller
institutions, including precincts, can buffer individual families from the
mega-forces of business and the State. These institutions have been in decline
since about 1960. (See again Robert Putnam’s research.) Parishes, ethnic clubs,
unions, school associations and the like are nowadays nearly powerless to help
ordinary families with health care, legal troubles, job assistance, child
rearing issues and the like. Meanwhile the mega-institutions grow more
unaccountable and the culture grows increasingly individualistic.
One result is relegation of political parties
to event planners. They are little more than entities that throw a convention
in one or another city every four years. Candidates count on their party for
very little and if elected are accountable only to themselves and the donors
who gave specifically to their campaign. Legislation moves slowly, if at all,
because legislative leaders have no clout on so-called party members.
Ideologues emerge and command disproportionate power because they do not depend
on any party’s machine. Compromise is scorned. In telling Catholics to vote for
individuals our bishops are further eroding the milieu of mediating structures
that were once so promoted by and beneficial to U.S. Catholicism.
The bishops don’t want to say “punch the
ticket” because they rightly object to those Democratic candidates (and some
Republicans) who favor unrestricted access to abortion and because they object
to Republicans who, contrary to Catholic values, support the death penalty,
oppose labor unions, impede immigration reform and more.
The laity need support and guidance as
they make decisions in their province of citizenship. A voters’ guide is the
wrong tool. For starters our bishops might volunteer to be election judges come
November 2016. It would be humble witness to those who enter the polling
station.
To contact Bill Droel: write to PO Box 291102, Chicago, IL 60629.
No comments:
Post a Comment