Covid-19 accelerated our churches’ use of streaming and other audio-visual tools.
Marshall McLuhan (1911-1980) was a pioneer in media studies. Yet he is largely ignored in our day of omni-present media. Digital Communion by Nick Ripatrazone (Fortress Press, 2022) sets out to revive McLuhan through a focus on his Catholic faith.
McLuhan died before our universal use of mobile devices and laptops, before social media and before niche TV channels. Thus, some might say, he is irrelevant today. McLuhan is a fun writer, but—at least to some—he feels frivolous. He offers zingers, “probes,” and “explorations” without sustaining an argument. Readers might prefer “polished sentences and learned syntaxes,” Ripatrazone explains. A long, logical presentation, however, “can trick us into thinking that stylistic writing equals intellectual certainty, but McLuhan felt such an approach stymied inquiry.” Instead, McLuhan’s books are peppered with cartoons, reproductions of advertisements, provocative one-liners, discursive illusions to literature and more. “I don’t explain, I explore,” McLuhan said.
Perhaps McLuhan is neglected because his central idea was never well-understood. For example, parents and teachers are wary about content on social media or on various websites. Others are concerned about how information is presented by TV commentators. McLuhan’s interest in media was different. His tag line was “The medium is the message.” The primary concern, he believed, is not content. It is the technology itself. Simply having a mobile device in one’s pocket, changes the environment. A laptop or a TV in the house, no matter what website is accessed or what channel is tuned-in, changes its user and the environment. A mounted screen inside a church changes worship, regardless of what is projected.
McLuhan, contrary to an assumption during his time, was not a cheerleader for each new invention. He wanted his audience to be aware that the use of a technology conforms them to that technology and that, especially with screens, media has the power to anesthetize.
Yet, McLuhan decidedly was not a prophet of doom. He had a Catholic sensibility, Ripatrazone writes. Our experience of the world comes to us “in disparate images, experiences and ideas,” Ripatrazone continues. And to McLuhan and others who share a sacramental imagination, it is all unified by God. Our world is full of grace, though flawed by sinful people and their wayward institutions. McLuhan’s challenge is to look not only for the message but for the nature of the medium (positive and negative) in each of our encounters. Media effect a change, Ripatrazone says, not only through the content we receive but in the way we think and act.
No comments:
Post a Comment