Covid-19 brings us an opportunity to experiment with different work
arrangements, including shorter hours. For example, the 100 employees at
Kickstarter (www.kickstarter.com), a popular crowd-funding platform, will work
four days per week in 2022, a minimum of 32 hours. Their pay remains the same
as when the company required 40 hours. Aziz Hasan, Kickstarter CEO, says this
is not a gimmick. “It’s really about…a more potent impact… [And] it opens up so
much more range for us personally.”
Autonomy
(https://autonomy.work), a research firm in the United Kingdom, has completed
its participation in a five-year study of over 2,500 employees in Iceland.
Backed by unions and civic groups, the workweek was four days with 36-hours per
worker. Productivity remained the same. Sick days decreased. Customers noted
better quality of service. Now, 86% of Iceland employees are allowed a four-day
week. Another Autonomy study is under way in Scotland. For more on this get
Autonomy’s Overtime: Why We Need a Shorter Working Week
by Kyle Lewis (Verso, 2021).
The motivation for a
shorter workweek on the part of executives is the realization that attracting
and retaining competent employees, particularly because of Covid-19, is an
expensive challenge. Some companies adopted employment flexibility long before
Covid-19. For example, since the 1990s, Metro Plastic Technologies
(www.metroplastics.com) has used six-hour days with 30-hours per week at
comparable pay as a recruitment tool. The company has few worker shortages,
according to Wall St. Journal (7/31/21).
Here are some considerations about a
shorter workweek.
There will be complaints
from a supplier or customer or worker or investor. A manager has to stand
secure, resisting a premature return to old ways.
Flex-time and shorter
workweek experiments can fail when they are implemented top-down, neglecting a
genuine buy-in from employees from the start. Experiments originating with employees
likely turn out better.
Workaholics are a further
challenge. Some employees think clocking 50+ hours per week is noble in itself.
A workaholic culture has infected many firms.
Keep in mind that the
purpose of a shorter workweek is betrayed if time off is spent on unnecessary
consumption. Waiting for the Weekend by Witold
Rybcznski (Penguin Press, 1991) is a fascinating examination of how people
carry their working day mentality into their time off by, for example, working on their putting.
Josef Pieper (1904-1997)
says this mentality exists because our culture is one of “total labor.” The
true purpose of time off is to establish “the right and claims of leisure in
the face of the claims of total labor,” he writes in Leisure: the Basis of Culture (Ignatius
Press, 1952). The obstacle is an economy premised on total work. It needs “the
illusion of a life fulfilled.” So instead of genuine time off, it puts forth
false leisure with “cultural tricks and traps and jokes.”
True leisure, Pieper
concludes, is festivity or celebration. It is the point at which
“effortlessness, calm and relaxation” come together. And true leisure
“ultimately derives its life from divine worship,” even though people may not
be conscious of the association.
“Have leisure and know that I am God.” –Psalm 46:11
Droel is with National Center for the
Laity (PO Box 291102, Chicago, IL 60629)
No comments:
Post a Comment