Larry Keogh, a fellow
teacher at our community college, began each semester by telling his students:
“Life is not fair.” He used various techniques and examples to make this
point. To master his course (social
science) our students needed this maxim, Keogh believed. They likewise needed
it to navigate their careers and their personal lives.
Atul
Gawande is a surgeon in Boston and author of best-selling Being Mortal (Picador, 2014). He recently interviewed a couple in
his Ohio hometown. The 47-year old wife had health problems since high school
graduation. She had a medical discharge from the Army because of fatigue.
Doctors were not getting at her precise ailment. They prescribed opioids for
her joint pain. She became addicted and had to start withdrawal treatment. Then
her liver began to fail. Finally, doctors at the famous Cleveland Clinic named
the problem and found effective medication. This woman, Gawande reports, “got
her life back.” Meanwhile her husband fell and was out of his job as an
electrical technician for six months.
The
couple has “amazing insurance,” says the wife. Maybe so, writes Gawande in The New Yorker (10/2/17). But their
policy has “a $6,000 deductible and hefty co-pays and premiums.” During their
setback, the annual health care costs to the family reached $15,000. They did
not tell their extended family that they had to file for bankruptcy; which
brings us to the curious part of this story.
Bankruptcy
is “a personal failure,” says the husband, even though medical costs caused the
bankruptcy. “Everybody should contribute for the treatment they receive,” the
husband says. His wife is ambivalent about the Affordable Care Act, but she
does not think adequate health insurance is a human right. “I work really
hard,” the wife says. “I deserve a little more than the guy who sits around.”
For this couple, any articulation of a right is accompanied by unwanted
government regulation and allocation. They are also convinced that many people
cheat the government. They have anecdotal “evidence.”
This
couple’s “feelings are widely shared,” says Gawande. Many people in our country
are uncomfortable with human rights
talk. They are adverse to government programs. And in a defining characteristic
of their thinking, these people make a distinction between the deserving poor
and the undeserving poor.
Modernity
teaches that hard work leads to success; failure is at least partially related
to a personal defect. For example, John Calvin (1509-1564), one of modernity’s
influential leaders, wrote in a typical Scripture commentary: “Adversity is a
sign of God’s absence; prosperity of his presence.” This thinking is deep in
our culture. TV talk show hosts, preachers, self-help writers, political
candidates, technology entrepreneurs, sports stars, education gurus and more,
all tell us that we are responsible for the outcome of our lives. Life is what
we make of it, or don’t make of it. Some people might experience an
unfortunate, temporary setback. They deserve help. But others create their own
misery. They do not deserve help.
It is
common in a bar, a barbershop, a neighborhood restaurant, a church club, a
family gathering to hear in so many words: “Being charitable is important to me
but I don’t owe assistance to anyone. Some people need a handout, but my taxes
should not go into assistance programs.”
Is
health insurance a corollary to the right to life? That is, something that is unalienable
and not hinged to one’s social status or lifestyle. Or is health insurance a
privilege, something that some people deserve more than others? That is, health insurance is not unalienable
and is only begrudgingly extended to the careless. Is life fair?
Droel’s booklet, What Is Social Justice?, is available from National Center for the
Laity (PO Box 291102, Chicago, IL 60629)
No comments:
Post a Comment