Some philosophical and
religious traditions look askance at fashion. Eastern religions, for example,
focus on the transitory nature of the material world. They advise us not to get
infatuated with appliances, jewelry or one’s wardrobe. Gnostic philosophy, which
has at junctures influenced Roman Catholicism and other expressions of Christianity,
says appearances are a deceptive illusion. Some strains in evangelical
Christianity are unimpressed with art because only a direct relationship with
God is important.
Being an
Irish-American Catholic, I carry around an analogical imagination. That is, in
my tribe God is mediated through the world’s beauty and order, particularly
through God’s primary analogue, other people. Nature, artifacts, responsive
institutions, plus architecture, music, film, novels and even fashion can
dispose me to God’s grace.
This
column won’t at first ring true to anyone who knows me because nearly my entire
wardrobe is off-the-rack from outlet stores. Nonetheless, I take notice of a
student or neighbor who has style, a look, or flair—maybe an unusual hat, a
colorful scarf, or a sport coat that seems to match the personality. These
touches, at times, briefly reflect the divine to me. In Fyodor Dostoevsky’s
novel, The Idiot, a character says,
“The world is saved by beauty, if at all.” That seems right to me.
Catholicism
is in favor of fashion, though with an urgent caution. There is no place for
the exploitation of designers and models, including on the so-called reality TV shows. Similarly, the
sweatshop conditions in the apparel industry must give way to international
labor standards.
Bill
Cunningham (1929-2016), the longtime fashion reporter for New York Times, brought his Catholic faith to bear in his work, though
implicitly. Cunningham himself was no fashion plate. He usually wore a blue
jacket with large pockets. Into his 80s, Cunningham peddled a bicycle around
Manhattan. He never owned a TV; he didn’t go to movies. Yet society types and
models were pleased whenever Cunningham drifted into a party or a show.
Cunningham never sampled the hors d’oeuvres nor even took a soda at any of the
galas. “I just try to play a straight game, and in New York that’s almost
impossible to be honest and straight,” he once said.
Upon
return to New York from his service in the Korean War Cunningham took newspaper
writing assignments about fashion. He added a $35 camera to his reporter’s
notebook. By the late 1970s he was full-time and soon developed a popular “On
the Street” column.
His idea
was that fashion is not just patterns and material in a studio. I went to “the
shows and the streets to see how people interpreted what designers hoped they
would buy,” he once said. He found out that ordinary New Yorkers in their own
way create fashion. Cunningham came to believe that fashion is all around. He
spent many hours on the streets looking for a stylish accessory or a unique
outfit. On the street, he said, “you find the answers you don’t see at the fashion
shows… My whole thing is to be invisible. You get more natural pictures that
way, too.”
Fashionable
does not mean expensive. It is about a person’s confidence and their
consciousness of the world around them. We are saved by beauty.
Cunningham’s
humble lifestyle attuned him to the beauty of all God’s creation. One of Pope
Francis’ major themes is the priority of experience over ideology or
abstractions. Cunningham once explained his approach to work in words that echo
that theme: “I never go out with a preconceived idea. I let the street speak to me.”
Trivia
contest: Who was the world’s first fashion designer?
Hint: Genesis 3:21.
Droel edits INITIATIVES (PO Box 291102, Chicago, IL
60629), a free newsletter about faith and work.
No comments:
Post a Comment