'Tis the season of wonderful myths. Our steering committee of Voces’ New
Sanctuary Movement was invited to the St. Charles Borromeo Parish in Burlington,
Wisconsin to do a dramatization of the story of Our Lady of Guadalupe.
We discussed myths as we traveled to
Burlington; it took over an hour. What were
we doing, out on a cold, snowy, and dark evening? The discussion went as follows: Christmas
time puts us in touch with myths from all faiths. Such myths are comforting, but they also
could propel us to create new political
structures for the common good. We decided
that you cannot say a myth is false in the sense that it is not historical or
scientific. Scientific or historical
truth is not the purpose of a myth. Its purpose
is to give understanding to something that is very difficult or impossible to
explain. There were still questions by
the time we got to Burlington.
Cast of the Play in honor of Our Lady of Guadalupe
The
reception at the parish was warm and friendly.
Most of the people were Latinos but not all. We celebrated Mass which included Aztec
dancing; we prayed the Rosary and we did our play. The singing of our committee member, Maria Guadalupe,
was a moving religious experience for me.
Her song petitioned the beloved and pregnant, dark skinned Mother of the
Savior for the gift of Justice and Peace. The liturgy was a loving act of resistance in
a repressive foreign culture.
But what about the Gospel Christmas myths of
Matthew and Luke; are they still viable?
Let’s look at another example that says yes to myths.
The gospel of Luke has the birth of Jesus
announced to shepherds, working people, by angels, messengers from heaven. The Savior is a Jewish peasant child born in
a stable in occupied Israel. What does this mean? The angels caroled, “Good news of great joy”…
“Peace on earth to those of good will.” (Luke C. 2, vs. 10 - 14) The revelation goes directly against the
Roman good news myth of, Pax Romana, –
peace through aristocratic military might.
Let us
remember, fifty years ago the world was on the cusp of nuclear
destruction. John XXIII responded with
his encyclical, Pacem in Terris. (Peace on Earth)
The Cuban missile crisis of October, 1962
had been resolved by negotiation. John
XXIII had pleaded, “We implore all rulers not to remain deaf to the cry of
humanity for peace … to resume negotiations … to set in motion, to encourage
and accept discussions at all levels and at any time a maximum of wisdom and
prudence.” (Douglass, James, JFK and the Unspeakable, Orbis Books, Maryknoll,
New York, 2008 p. 339) Vatican Council
II had opened a few days before the world was aware of the threat of nuclear destruction. The Council’s opening message from the Church
Fathers stressed peace and social justice.
By April of 1963 talks on a nuclear testing
treaty seemed to have broken down. John
XXIII presented his encyclical, Pacem in Terris, on April 11th. Khrushchev had seen a copy. Kennedy, of course, could not refer to any
influence by the Pope. The Encyclical
proposed mutual trust as opposed to mutual nuclear escalation for complete annihilation
as the road to peace. The path to a disarmament treaty looked dark,
but on June 10th Kennedy gave his greatest and most radical speech
at the American University commencement program. James Douglass wrote, “The American
University address owed much to Pacem in Terris.” (Ibid. p. 347) Kennedy
announced a unilateral suspension of nuclear tests in the atmosphere to promote
“our primary long range interest, general and complete disarmament.” (Ibid. p.
xxvi).
Benevolent dictator Pope Francis has
indicated that the ‘Peace thru Justice’ theme of Vatican II and Pacem in Terris
is not completely dormant in the Roman Catholic Church but surely needs to be
revived. In the Francis papacy, Roman
Catholic theologians may be given the freedom to explain faith and myths in
terms of peace and justice. The spark
for revival is there; I’ve heard many people say, “because of Pope Francis, I’m
proud to be a Catholic.”
No comments:
Post a Comment