'to be or not to be, that's the question.'
This blog seeks to explore issues around Faith and the Labor Movement historically and presently.
The term 'liberal' is often used in politics and economics. The different meanings of the term, liberal, conflict with one another. for example, the classical use of the term 'liberal' in economics means no interference by government. This was established by Adam Smith, Ricardo, and Malthus. Their theories were the basis of capitalism. the term, 'neo-liberal' includes a dominant influence by government in trade transactions, for example, setting the rules for free trade. Economist Milton Friedman, and Presidents Bush, Clinton, and Obama are examples. The economic order of neo-liberalism is now being attacked and replaced by Donald Trump with ethno-nationalism.
Manifest Destiny 'liberal', for example, Theodore Roosevelt, included expansionism, motivated by the doctrine that America's mission is to lead the world. Government interference issued for the purpose of America's leadership.
The New Deal 'liberalism' of Franklin Roosevelt promoted government interference to provide labor rights and purchasing power for consumers.
The Merriam-Webster dictionary says the meaning 'liberal' is to be open to ideas and ways of behaving that are not conventional or traditional. the dictionary goes on to say that 'liberal' means broad-minded or tolerant.
For Milwaukee Mayor Frank Zeidler (1948 - 1960), 'liberalism was openness to new ideas, a society that respects the individual and the common good. Zeidler was a Democratic Socialist, the party that was opposed to war.
Victor Berger, the founder of the Democratic Socialist Party in Milwaukee opposed World War I. For his opposition to World War I, Berger was indicted under the Espionage Act in 1918. He and four other Socialist party leaders were convicted in Chicago and then sentenced to twenty years in prison. The U.S Supreme Court overturned Berger's conviction in 1921 and, with his name cleared, he won election to Congress in 1922, 1924, and 1926.Opposition to war was key to Zeidler's philosophy of government. He wrote:
'The Brotherhood of Man' becomes a trap and snare
Unless a man reflects;
For only by a knowledge of our difference can we dare
To remedy defects.
Our tastes are not the same;
We do not thrive in equal ways.
And useless is the aim,
Without this sight, for peace that stays.
For Frank Zeidler, peace was at the core of 'liberal.' Other liberal manifestations resulted in war. Zeidler is a Democratic Socialist. He never aspired to much more than living above the poverty level. He insisted to a colleague that he would always call himself a 'liberal' when it was suggested that it was suggested that it was a term not respected. Zeidler would not accept the tag 'progressive.' He was a 'liberal.'
The struggle that we are currently experiencing with Trump must be challenged. It is the destruction no only of neo-liberalism, but of the American Experiment that 'All are created equal, with the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.' Mayor Frank Zeidler's understanding of 'liberal' is an excellent basis for this challenge.
Resources:
The Making of Milwaukee, John Gurda, Milwaukee County Historical Society, 1999.
Reflections: the poetry of a young Frank Zeidler, published by the Milwaukee public Library, 2002.
Liberal in City Government: My Experiences As Mayor Of Milwuakee, by Frank P. Zeidler, Milwaukee Publishers, LLC, 2005.
HOPE from
History Compressed
The Gospel
of Luke describes Mary receiving the news that Christ would be with us
all.
The struggle of Judaism at the time was against Rome. It was hopeless, but Mary on her visitation to her cousin said,
…for the Mighty One has done great things for us – holy is his name.
His mercy extends to those who fear him, from generation to generation.
He has performed mighty deeds with his arm; he has scattered those who are proud in their inmost thoughts.
He has brought down rulers from their thrones, but has lifted up the humble.
He has filled the hungry with good things but has sent the rich away empty.
Luke 1:46-50
We have hope. Let us speak out against Trump and his minions.
Theologian Matthew Fox is mistaken in associating the Celtic spiritual tradition of St. Patrick with Teilhard de Chardin. Teilhard, the Frenchman, overcooks Celtic spirituality.
Ray Nogar writes:
The God of the strange world of Father Teilhard is not the one I have come to believe in. His is the God of the neat; mine is the God of the messy. His God governs with unerring efficiency; mine provides with inexcusable waste. His God is impeccably regular; mine is irresponsible. His God is the Lord of order; my God is the Lord of the Absurd.
[The Lord of the Absurd by Raymond J. Nogar, O.P., p. 126. Herder and Herder, New York, 1966.]
Gary Gerstle’s history of contemporary economics is an outstanding work. It offers a structure to remember and criticize recent economic history and also suggests pertinent questions for consideration. Gerstle’s summary of liberalism begins with classic liberalism of the 18th Century based on the analysis of Adam Smith. This is followed by Keynesian liberalism, dominated and led by Franklin D. Roosevelt and his New Deal. Next came neo-liberalism. In our opinion, in all phases of liberalism, imperialism is denoted.
Classic liberalism, which promoted a free market economy based on profit, resulted in poverty for millions. Slavery continued from the previous order of mercantilism. Lady Wilde’s poem as follows described the potato famine where cash crops were sent overseas while the Irish starved:
Weary men, what reap ye?
—Golden corn for the stranger.What sow ye?
—Human corpses that wait for the avenger.
Fainting forms, hunger‐stricken, what see you in the offing?
Stately ships to bear our food away, amid the stranger's scoffing.
There's a proud array of soldiers—what do they round your door?
They guard our masters' granaries from the thin hands of the poor.
Pale mothers, wherefore weeping?
—Would to God that we were dead
Our children swoon before us, and we cannot give them bread.
The Famine Year: poem by Lady Jane Wilde, The Penguin Book of Irish Verse, Penguin Books, 1970.
Each epoch delineated by Gerstle is precluded by a movement and
then established as an order.
Classic liberalism was based on free trade. It
replaced the economic order of mercantilism.
Free trade meant an elimination of tariffs and minimal government
intervention in business.
According to Gerstle, free market liberalism collapsed with the
Great Depression. The answer was found in
the theories of J. M. Keynes who showed the need for purchasing power by
consumers.
Keynes’ theory highlighted the then-considered factors of
production, land, labor, and capital, and added consumers to the list. For consumers to have purchasing power,
government needed to intervene.
This was a successful policy, but collapsed with the depression of
the thirties. C. H. Douglas also had
some ideas at the time of Keynes, but Keynes’ ideas were selected. Douglas claimed that his program of credits
would eliminate economic fluctuations and would negate war as a means to
establish needed markets. His system
would eliminate overproduction and unemployment. Douglas died before World War II; he saw it
coming and died as a very sad man.
The following is Frank Zeidler’s poem describing the alienated worker in the Roosevelt era.
I have not thought much of what it must be like to be struck by some of the weapons us munitions workers make. I really don’t think there is going to be a big war anyway, and even if there is, we might as well enjoy ourselves right now.
“I Am the Munitions-Maker. And I Am.” Poem by Frank Zeidler, former Milwaukee Socialist mayor published by Milwaukee Public Library, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 2002.
Roosevelt’s New Deal provided jobs and wages for workers, but also war. Japanese citizens were rounded up and imprisoned and also some Italian and German families were imprisoned. Economic hegemony replaced military control. Roosevelt’s success made him very and he ran and was elected to a fourth term. Martin Kennelly, an Irish immigrant, despite family pressure, voted for Dewey in 1944 because he was afraid of Roosevelt being established as a King. Roosevelt’s New Deal liberalism lasted until the 70’s when complaints about high taxes, inflation, and government interference in business opened a new path for another liberalism, neo-liberalism.
Neo-liberalism had a long history of
formation. A key moment in its history
was the Bretton Woods, New Hampshire Conference in 1944. Delegates from the major capitalist countries
on the verge of the World War II victory, suggested a new economic order of
minimal control by government for a free market economy. Financial rules were set up controlled by the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank.
Both U.S. political parties supported this initiative. Rules were set for a global economy. The term, globalization of the economy, was used. The system was called neo-liberalism to distinguish it from classic liberalism, the classic liberalism of Adam Smith and the liberalism of Franklin D. Roosevelt.
The collapse came rather quickly.
Poverty hit the main laboratory of the experiment in Chile. The advocates of the Chicago school of
Friedman economics were wrong.
Free trade meant the movement of manufacturing from the United
States to Latin American countries seeking low wages.
Gary Gerstle does not note a major breaking point. The Zapatista armed challenge in Mexico the
opening day of the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1994 indicated
serious trouble for neo-liberalism.
Donald Trump challenged neo-liberalism in his first term. Gary Gerstle has yet to comment on his second
term which has taken a wrecking ball to the neo-liberal system. Trump’s policy of America First destroys world economic liberalism and promotes a new
imperialism led by the U.S.
Gerstle does not foresee an economic order that would supplant
Trump’s new version of imperialism.
Wouldn’t it be different if the factors that move the world economic
system would adjust free market capitalism to serve the common good, as
determined by the people, and would respect the sacredness of the earth?
The Rise and Fall of Neo-Liberal Order: America and the world in the free market era by Gary Gerstle, Oxford University Press, 2022
|
Generally,
those in education, health care, ministry, civil service and more want to do
good through their daily work. However, the outcome of their efforts often
produces the opposite of what they intend. Schools produce too many uncultured
young adults. Frustration among patients and health professionals is a major
side-effect of health care delivery. Churches reinforce individualistic
attitudes. The civil service system, top to bottom, often delivers dependency
and/or corruption.
The bad side-effects come from the
nature of our bureaucratic system in which transactions supersede personal
attention. Students relate to teachers by way of grade sheets. Patients relate
to doctors and nurses through charts and test results. A business simply counts
an employee as a debit on the expense sheet, rather than as a unique
individual.
Some time ago, Msgr. Ivan Illich
(1926-2002) gave a talk to seminarians, titled “To Hell With Good
Intentions.” These North American
seminarians were about to spend a summer helping people in Mexico. Illich told
them to discard their unacknowledged pretention that You people will be better because I
know better. Those
who desire to help, said Illich, have “enormous good will [but] an abysmal lack
of intuitive delicacy.”
L.M. Sacasas, writing in The Convivial
Society, summarizes Illich’s challenge and gives it current application,
including to those involved with artificial intelligence. How deeply do
computer engineers reflect on the harm that their programs cause, Sacasas asks?
All our tools and devices come along with “a perspective on the world.” The
devices subtly encourage their users to adopt an individualistic attitude, he
continues.
Too often unexamined helping behavior results
in “a loss of personal potency,” says Sacasas. The more that nice people apply
their notion of helpfulness and forsake “critical self-awareness,” the more
that patients, students, parishioners, employees and citizens lose agency.
In this talk to seminarians and in his
other writing, Illich delivers a stern warning. The warning does not, however,
support the neoconservative position that all government assistance (Medicare,
food stamps, disaster relief, etc.) should end. Illich’s positive advice to the
seminarians and to us is a “silence of deep interest.” At prayer each evening,
consider the question: Whom did I really help today?
Pope Francis preaches the same when he
urges Christians to develop a “culture of encounter.” Go to the peripheries and
look squarely at others. Listen to them with an unbiased heart. Programs, notebooks,
handouts and bandages can be appropriate. But the genuine helper is skilled in
the art of active listening. Lo and behold, the helper who listens can discover
something about herself. So too, each true exchange between people is an
encounter with God, our God who is Unified Community, a Blessed Trinity.
Droel edits a free, printed newsletter,
INITIATIVES (PO Box 291102, Chicago, IL 60629)